10/9/2023 0 Comments Dana schwartz twitterSag believes that, at this point in time, generative AI does not require a major overhaul of the U.S. However, he claimed generative AI is also not designed to copy original expression and does not copy data in any literal sense, which means training generative AI on copyrighted works is typically fair use. Matthew Sag began his testimony by stating that “copyright law does not, and should not, recognize computer systems as authors” because AI is not capable of original intellectual conception. Matthew Sag, Professor of Law, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Data Science, Emory University School of Law She explained that it is hard to remove content based on unauthorized use of copyrighted material, via avenues such as filters. In addition to consent, credit, and compensation, Ortiz also advocated for transparency in data sharing and affirmative opt-in policies, as opposed to retroactive opt-out policies. AI companies, she argues, train systems with copyrighted and licensed data without artists’ consent, credit, or compensation, which creates an exploitative environment that threatens artists’ livelihoods. 3, Loki, The Eternals, Black Panther, Avengers: Infinity War, and Doctor Strange, has been repeatedly taken and repurposed by AI without her knowledge, compensation, or consent. Ortiz claimed that her work, which has helped shape blockbuster films such as Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. Karla Ortiz, Concept Artist, Illustrator, and Fine Artist Harleston encouraged the Committee to consider a Federal Right of Publicity statute, which is currently recognized in a slim majority of state statutes. Citing experiences with his broad client base, he noted that AI in the service of artists and creativity is useful however, “irresponsible” AI that appropriates an artist’s work, name, image, or voice, is exploitation and should require affirmative consent. In his testimony, Harleston, a representative from UMG, one of the leaders in music-based entertainment that contracts with artists like Taylor Swift, Alicia Keys, Drake, and The Weeknd, noted that songwriters and artists rely on the fundamentals of copyright. Jeffrey Harleston, General Counsel and Executive Vice President of Business and Legal Affairs, Universal Music Group (UMG). The following is a brief summary of the testimonies given: But he also said that “action is clearly required.”Ī wide array of experts, including artists, music industry leaders, and tech company executives, spoke to a large audience. Tillis stated that with proper regulation and oversight, AI is not a threat to the future and is key to maintain the U.S.’s status as a leader in innovation and creativity. Ranking Member Thom Tillis (R-NC) noted that the creative community is experiencing immediate and acute challenges and called for the Subcommittee to carefully study what legislative guardrails may be necessary. Coons focused on two issues: (1) whether using copyrighted content to train AI models is copyright infringement and (2) whether AI-generated content should be given copyright protection. In his opening statement, Chairman Coons explained that while AI opens new avenues for innovation and creativity, the increased use of generative AI in creative industries creates essential copyright law questions that affect not only the creative community but U.S. #DANA SCHWARTZ TWITTER SERIES#The hearing comes approximately one month after the Subcommittee’s hearing on AI and Patents, Innovation, and Competition, and is the second in a series of hearings on AI and IP. More accurately, an AI-generated version of Frank Sinatra’s voice sang about regulating AI to the tune of New York, New York, which Senator Chris Coons (D-DE), Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, used to illustrate both the possibilities and the risks of the use of AI in creative industries.Ĭhairman Coons presided over a hearing entitled “Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property-Part II: Copyright,” which aimed to explore the nuances of creating legislation that would protect copyright while incentivizing AI innovation. In an unconventional opening to the normally staid proceedings of the United States Senate, the voice of Frank Sinatra introduced the JSenate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing on artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |